Spanning tree cheat sheet version 2.0Posted by stretch in Announcements on Monday, 25 Aug 2008 at 2:03 a.m. GMTThe old spanning tree cheat sheet had numerous problems (as dutifully pointed out by a number of readers), so I decided to rework it from scratch. Today I've uploaded the new STP cheat sheet, version 2.0. The new sheet is two pages, expanded to include full IOS configuration examples of both PVST+ and MST. Through some amount of pain, I've also managed to draw up a specifications flow chart, illustrating the development of the various spanning tree protocols over the past decade or so. I felt this was important, as many people still refer to RSTP as 802.1w and MST as 802.1s, when in fact those supplements have been merged into the finalized 802.1D and 802.1Q standards, respectfully. It's also interesting to see how Cisco has developed their proprietary per-VLAN implementations in parallel to the open standards. As always, feel free to download and distribute freely, and please let me know if you uncover any errors. |
Navigation
Armory
Online Toolbox
|
nice nice - this was needed !
note: rapid pvst+ is usualy called "pvrst+" than "rpvst+"
The specifications flow chart is awesome. That clears up a very confusing topic
Awesome work man, I appreciate it. I always get confused with the whole STP process.. this will definitely help out with studying!
Thanks
@invalidCCIE
RPVST+ (also known as PVRST+)...
Nice !!
This is great man! My favorite one yet and just in time for my ICND2 cramming. Thanks!
way to go stretch, this always helps
Excellent as usual!
Thanks for the work! These are absolutely fantastic, as usual!
Per Google: 616 for rpvst. 2,850 for pvrst.
There wasn't enough aggregate info to get trends :-(
Very nice writeup.
Mavellous bro!! Excellent work once again....
"many people still refer to RSTP as 802.1w and MST as 802.1s, when in fact those supplements have been merged into the finalized 802.1D and 802.1Q standards, respectfully." Thanks for this but the reason everyone thinks this is that the Ciscopress books give out the wrong information which is very annoying.